Author: TheRealMrPositive

Billy Bathgate (1991)

Coming up to a century since the figures depicted walked the earth, the media has been awash with tales of gangsters. Organised syndicates of mobsters have been turned into living legends, with films like The Godfather and Goodfellas, dosing the cold, hard reality of their lives, lost in their depictions. Their crimes fuel their “cool factor” amongst the impressionable. In 1991, years after the events depicted in a film showed the rise and fall of one criminal empire through the young eyes of Billy Bathgate.

Trailer.

Poor but talented, Billy quickly builds up a relationship with local mobster Dutch Schultz. Doing odd jobs for his syndicate and reaping the lifestyle. Tensions are rising between the pressure from prosecutors wanting to make a name for themselves, rival gangsters looking to expand into Schultz’s operations, and disloyalty in Schultz’s ranks. Donning the name, Bathgate, temptation will also come into Bathgate’s way in the form of Drew Prescott and dealing with the unpredictable nature of Schultz. Will Bathgate find his payday at the end of his criminal career?

TV Spot.

Mobster fever was certainly in the air in the early 90s, perhaps due to the success of Goodfellas and, to a lesser extent, the Dick Tracy film. But between Bugsy and Miller’s Crossing, the competition was cutthroat for films about organised mobsters. Most of the film is told from the titular Billy’s perspective, so we are treated to a lot of shots of him reacting to the highs and lows of mobster life and the whims of Schultz. It is interesting also seeing how all that gets upended with the inclusion of Drew into the mix, sworn to protection by her ex Weinberg, who disappeared one fateful day in 1935. That being said, it is a mob film, and you will have a certain expectation of certain set pieces that they will provide. Billy’s trials through the highs and lows of mobster life will more often than not hit those marks.

Another TV Spot.

Touchstone managed to assemble a compelling cast to tell this story, the film blending real-life gangland figures with fictional characters to help drive the narrative forward. Nicole Kidman is as charming as ever as the gangster’s moll and femme fatale, Drew Prescott. It feels like hardly any time has passed since her time in that tense boat-based thriller, Dead Calm, some few years earlier. Steve Buscemi is here decades before his success as Nucky Thompson, as is Bruce Willis, who feels born to play Bo Weinberg. Even though his presence in the film is brief, he still oozes the cool customer persona that served as his Bruno character. But eyes are on Dustin Hoffman as Schultz, you never quite know what character will be in each scene, from charismatic talker to dangerous psychopath, all in the blink of an eye.

Trailer.

Billy Bathgate, although following the usual conventions of these mobster films, does tell an interesting tale of Schultz right before his fall. Blending its truth and fiction, with an impressionable youth serving as an audience surrogate, tells its crime doesn’t pay message entertainingly. If you like those tales, this is yet another example of a slice of the Cosa Nostra. While there is no shortage of crime films, the tale of Billy Bathgate is unique enough.

Official Trailer.

If you want more positive reviews delivered to the e-mail box of your choice, you can click on that little text bubble at the bottom of the screen. Do you agree or disagree? or have a suggestion for another pop-culture artefact that needs a positive light shone on it? Leave a comment in the comment box below! But remember to keep it positive!

The Adventures Of Pluto Nash (2002)

When creating a film intended for the whole family to enjoy, it becomes a delicate balancing act to keep every segment entertained without straying too far in one or more directions. Sometimes the old ideas still work best, even if you have to jazz them up to sell them. In 2002, a film looked to the year 2087 to tell a story of blasters, droids, nightclubs, and the continuing Adventures of Pluto Nash.

Pluto Nash official trailer

Ex-smuggler, Pluto Nash, has recently come into great fortune by buying a failing club from his buddy and turning it around into the hippest spot on the moon. Seven years on, a Kingpin by the name of Rex Crater wants the club, and he’s willing to use hired goons to get what he wants. With an ageing robotic bodyguard and an aspiring singer/waitress, looking to make just enough money for her ticket off the Moon. Pluto must keep one step ahead to get to the bottom of Crater’s plans.

Pluto Nash Trailer

Some attention was put into trying to create a plausible, but accessible world of the future. Little America feels like a location that you can tell the designers and writers had fun coming up with fun sight gags, even if some of them aged poorly, c’est la vie. In a sense, Little America seems like the perfect backdrop for this type of adventure, and you could see further sequels in this almost retro-futuristic landscape. Like many sci-fi films made around the turn of the millennium, Pluto Nash also features some fun special effects. Not only in its world-building, but in its gags. That being said, Pluto Nash isn’t a sci-fi spectacle; in its heart lies a pulp adventure of yesteryear, too, one that is thrilling, funny, and goes in places you wouldn’t expect.

T.V. Spot

Pluto Nash’s character just happens to be a great vehicle for Murphy’s comedy. Being a character with a chequered past, a quick tongue and handy in a fight, which sums up a lot of Eddie Murphy’s more successful roles in cinema if you think about it. Rosario Dawson plays a singer, Dina Lake, who is in over her head and looking for a ticket back home. Even Jackie Brown herself, Pam Grier, shows up for a few scenes as Pluto’s outlaw mother. And no, that isn’t Brent Spiner, it is Randy Quad playing the antiquated android bodyguard Bruno, although I can see why you might be confused. A couple of cute cameos also present themselves, from Alec Baldwin, Luis Guzmán (as Pluto’s Biggest fan), and John Cleese (the automatic robot-chauffeur). It is nice that the latter could pay off his role from the abandoned Beverly Hills Cop 3 concept. So the cast is all here and does well to populate the world of Little America.

T.V. Spot 2

Pluto Nash is a cute adventure, one that is fun for all the family, and has an unearned reputation. Murphy’s charm is ever-present in this fun retro-futuristic caper that genuinely had plot developments I did not see coming. If you want a ticket for adventure, and a trip to the moon is out of the question, this film is a great substitute.

Trailer

If you want more positive reviews delivered to the e-mail box of your choice, you can click on that little text bubble at the bottom of the screen. Do you agree or disagree? or have a suggestion for another pop-culture artefact that needs a positive light shone on it? Leave a comment in the comment box below! But remember to keep it positive!

Star Trek: Section 31 (2025)

Utopias don’t come fully formed, often require more efforts than just the dreamer, the real hard work of the citizens to strive for that ideal and even then, sometimes that isn’t enough. In 2025, after a substantial time in a development limbo, Star Trek finally got to tell the story of the people behind the scenes to keep the Federation boldly going in Star Trek: Section 31.

We catch up with Philippa Georgiou, the evil Emperor from the Terran Empire, now an agent for this fledgling covert operative branch, Section 31. Doing the clandestine things that the Federation don’t want to be caught doing to promote their interests in the galaxy. The group’s problems are expedited, as a super-weapon designed previously by Georgiou has found its way into this dimension, and there’s a strong possibility of a mole in the new team. In a world of cloaks, daggers and covert ops, the real adventure is who to trust.

Section 31, the clandestine black ops branch of the Federation, has attracted a lot of speculation, especially during its introduction in the late 90s. The underhanded method by which they achieve results typically goes against the Federation’s ideals. It is interesting how the threat of this film does not stem from the established foes of the Alpha quadrant, but the Terran Empire. Usually, the realm of a quirky two-parter on the classic show, and less of a looming threat. Maybe the familiar faces of the Romulans or Klingons would have been more suitable threats, for a sequel series, but considering how their fates ended up in this Nu Trek universe.

This rag-tag bunch of operatives might not be what you would expect from William Sadler’s character back in Deep Space Nine. The gang feels more like the quintessentially marketable group of ragtag heroes that have been popular lately in popular culture. You have Michelle Yeoh, fresh off her Oscar, returning as the sassy empress. Robert Kazinsky, playing Zeph, a cyborg looking like a long-lost Hemsworth and a shape-shifter, played by Sam Richardson. Eyes are on the oddly emotional Vulcan, who is a robot, with a noticeable Irish accent and the human Rachel Garrett, a call back to fan favourite episode Yesterday’s Enterprise. Striving to keep the organisation true to the Federation’s ideals. The clandestine group does keep things fun in a manner that feels similar to other sci-fi action properties mentioned earlier. Some jokes having that Whedon-esque delivery and its apocalyptic threat feel right at home with modern tastes. Especially fans of newer Trek and the like. We can only speculate what elements of the show finally made it into this salvaged film, but it does show some promise at keeping the modern Star Trek vision going.

Star Trek has seen some dramatic changes since Roddenberry pitched the idea to Desilu Productions over 60 years ago. Changing circumstances have caused the very nature of TV to evolve with the times. From multi-season arcs to a single action adventure, it shows that Nu-Trek, as it is colloquially known, can operate just as well in any setting. A film filled with action and sass, and entertainment value shouldn’t be kept under wraps for long.

If you want more positive reviews delivered to the e-mail box of your choice, you can click on that little text bubble at the bottom of the screen. Do you agree or disagree? or have a suggestion for another pop-culture artefact that needs a positive light shone on it? Leave a comment in the comment box below! But remember to keep it positive!

Borderlands (2024)

Translating between one medium and another isn’t a small task. Improvements in technology and a growing art base taking the medium seriously have resulted in a golden age for video-game-to-film adaptations. While not exactly Citizen Kane, these films have become crowd pleasers, adapting the spirit and making a healthy profit. In 2024, with the franchise in an interesting position, Gearbox finally got its cinematic adaptation of its hit game franchise, Borderlands.

Long ago, the Eridians lived. They were clever, but hid their technology in a vault on a planet, Pandora. It’s since become a bit of a lawless wasteland, with everybody trying to get their hand on the keys to the vault. A prophecy says that one girl, Tina, will be the key to finally getting that vault open, so naturally, every outlaw on Pandora wants Tina, including Lilith, a bounty hunter; Roland, an ex-soldier; and Kreig, a childlike behemoth. As these unlikely mercenaries become allies, they’ll soon learn that prophecy and rules are sometimes meant to be broken.

I should preface this by saying, I am one of the few people with an internet connection who found the Borderland game franchise to not be their cup of tea. It takes all sorts to make a world, although I’ve played a few hours of the first one. So, going in relativity blind was fascinating. Bits and pieces gleaned over decades of cultural osmosis presented themselves, but Roth et al. effectively told the solid story of the franchise lore. The franchise is known for its alien landscapes and cell-shade look, and while the translation to film isn’t directly one-to-one, it does evoke the feel of the varied landmass that is Pandora, its inhabitants and its fauna. Maybe a lot of its nuance was lost in the translation on screen, but for a lot of the time, I couldn’t tell. What I could gather is that a lot of the game’s sense of humour and style made the transition to the big screen, offering a newcomer a great taste of the Borderlands experience.

The cast of characters feels especially crafted for this type of film. Such as Lilith, being a bounty hunter, you’ve got Cate Blanchett doing a kinda Decker narration of the film’s events, and I think she’s an interesting pair of eyes into the world of Pandora. Barbie’s own Ariana Greenblatt is now Tina, whose manic quips and antics feel like a stark contrast to her character in Barbie, and alongside her is Kevin Rock, who here is playing Roland. The de facto mascot, Claptrap, is also here, and at times, you couldn’t tell that the voice was Jack Black. Claptrap’s original voice actor has had strong disagreements with Gearbox, but Black manages to fill in well enough that you can hardly notice a difference. Personally, Kreig’s almost child-like innocence managed to made him an endearing character. So you’ll have a wide variety of characters to root for, even if you are, like me, not the biggest fan of the franchise going in.

Borderlands makes sense as a contender for the blockbuster treatment, with its wit, whimsy and tongue-in-cheek wackiness making it a darling for those who live, breathe and thrive on the internet. Roth mostly succeeds in translating that sense of style modernised into an hour and forty minutes, not being able to attest to what changes were made to make a blockbuster like this work. My expectations were met and then some. While I may not be the best fit for scouring Pandora, the loot here is pretty good.

If you want more positive reviews delivered to the e-mail box of your choice, you can click on that little text bubble at the bottom of the screen. Do you agree or disagree? or have a suggestion for another pop-culture artefact that needs a positive light shone on it? Leave a comment in the comment box below! But remember to keep it positive!

U2 – Songs Of Innocence (2014)

The particular trouble with gift-giving is that you never quite know how your present will be received. Sure, the receiver might feign gratitude, but you never know if your gift will end up buried in the back of a cupboard or worse, end up in a regifting pile. In 2014, in a bold gesture, Apple and U2 did a very kind gesture of teaming up and giving away their next album, whether you wanted to listen to the Songs Of Innocence.

Songs of Innocence is an 11-song album from U2. If you gave it a listen, you’d probably agree that the songs on it sound very much like what you’d expect from the band, so many decades into their career. Acclaimed producer Flood, who worked on some of the greatest albums from Depeche Mode, Nine Inch Nails, and, of course, U2, returns to help. Danger Mouse, half of the acclaimed Gnarls Barkley duo. Complete with the band, the 11 tracks make for an interesting album, one that sounds like U2 for the modern age.

This all may sound perfectly typical for the band, especially if you’ve been watching their success from afar. The album was digitally released to all Apple accounts, regardless of consent. Whether you like U2 or not, whether you wanted to be with the album or without it. There it was in your collection. People do like free stuff, and as one of the lucky hundreds who were given this album for gratis by Apple, I feel I gave the album more of my time than I would have done without it. There are some issues, of course, the automatic download that many people have available on their phones could eat into resources. Fans who belong to the Android ecosystem also couldn’t get to download the album for a long while, too.

So this stunt might have given some music fans a poor impression of the album, with streaming quickly becoming the primary way generations interact with music, even the free download might not be enough to win people over. Which is a shame, as alluded to earlier, some songs on the album are rather nice. I particularly liked the soundscape on The Troubles, and listened to that song a few times since its release. The album’s music is very introspective, drawing on the band’s early influences and packaged in a way that feels similar to the modern-rock sound of the mid-2010s.

Over a decade on, U2 continue to rock out, only this time opting for more traditional methods of getting their music out to fans. The issues of music discovery, music ownership, and even its value continue to rage on. Sounds of Innocence is a very fascinating experiment. Not being the first time that Apple gave away free downloads, only for the scheme to backfire on them and their partners. Even if you weren’t the biggest U2 fan, though, there was a chance that even you got to hear the Songs of Innocence.

If you want more positive reviews delivered to the e-mail box of your choice, you can click on that little text bubble at the bottom of the screen. Do you agree or disagree? or have a suggestion for another pop-culture artefact that needs a positive light shone on it? Leave a comment in the comment box below! But remember to keep it positive!